Saturday, 23 May 2015

Review: "A Hero of Our Time"

Based on the Russian classic of the same title by Mikhail Lermontov, Endla Theatre’s production "A Hero of Our Time"("Герой нашего времени") reached the public at the beginning of November last year. At the hands of the Latvian director Galina Polišuk, the timeless story has once again been blown to life.
„A Hero of Our Time“ is a story about a young, charismatic officer Petšorin who has lost all joy in life. Although he seems to have everything one would want from the world – the ladies, good looks,  fortune, social skills and contacts– Petšorin still fails to entertain himself. No woman nor life-threatening risk can bring up any emotions in the restless soul that resides in the young man’s body. The ultimate struggle is brilliantly portrayed by the talented Estonian actor Priit Loog, and together with his well-cast co-stars Kati Ong, Karin Tammaru and Tambet Seling, the stage is filled with lust, passion, heartbreak and betrayal.
Besides the great acting and obvious chemistry between the characters, the play also features some striking stage design. What might seem like a pile of trash at first sight turns out to be a mountain of clever artistic solutions, in my opinion. The scenic designer, Aigars Ozolinši, also visiting form Latvia, has found a compelling way to contribute to the portrayal of the mess in the main character’s head with his setting, which also proves to be very multi-functional throughout the play. To me, the whole technical production team has done a wonderful job – the music is spot-on, the costumes well-thought-out and the lighting quite nifty.
All in all, „A Hero of Our Time“ features on many different levels of art and binds them together in an entirety. If you enjoy good acting and metaphoric approaches, then this play is definitely something for you.  

Tuesday, 19 May 2015

Writing: Letter of Complaint

Dear Mrs Saar,

I am writing to draw your attention to some points of concern that I as a students have noticed in our school.
Whilst it is true that the students at Tallinn Secondary Science School are a quite small circle of chosen capable young people, I believe that this should not be used as an excuse to refer to them as being somewhat better than their peers in other schools. There have been a number of occasions where teachers note that one or the other thing should be self-explanatory to us as pupils of an ’elite’ school, or made remarks about not being ’elite-worthy’. Not only does it bring the students down but it may also promote elitarist attitude among them.
My second concern is the lack of flexibility in the school’s curriculum. In my opinion, the students should have the opportunity to choose more of their subjects in order to specialize in what actually interests them. The vast majority of young people attending secondary school have developed at least some understanding of where they are headed after graduating and therefore I believe that the school system should support their aspiration in different fields. The fact is that disinterest in subjects causes lack of motivation which, in turn, can lead to lower attendance and worse academic results.
All in all, I believe that flexibility and making a point of belonging to the elite are some areas of improvement in Tallinn Secondary Science School. For one thing, I would ask you to let go of the term ’elite’. As for improving the curriculum, might I suggest making subjects such as arts, music and physical education optional? The fact is that not everybody is interested in them or, on the contrary, there are those who exercise them regularly outside from school and therefore get no use form the courses.

Yours sincerely,

Hanna Maria Saik

Thursday, 20 November 2014

Connected, but alone?


They say technology is the greatest contributor to the development of mankind. They say it has changed our lives for the better. But is it invariably so? The cultural analyst Sherry Turkle, who specializes in the study of how technology is shaping the modern social life, proves it wrong in her speech “Connected, but alone?”, introducing us the negative effects our devices have on human communication.
It is worrying to Shelley, how technology is redefining our understanding of the very basic idea of what communication is.  Communication is the exchange of information between at least two sides. It is a mutual relationship – the one in possession of the info needs the other to listen and reflect, while the other needs someone to let him in on the topic in the first place. However, by looking towards robots and similar machinery for company, we are actually breaking this sense of mutuality because it is simply easier that way. In this case, we have control over the flow of communication – we don’t need to take into account the other sides’ views and can shape the conversation to fit our comfort zone, leaving no chance for spontaneity. The former is what people fear the most about real-time social interaction because it exposes them with no way to click the undo button.
While making us unable to freely socialize, technology has also robbed us of the ability to cope with loneliness, according to Shelley. We spend the better part of our days in the virtual world, trying to constantly find company. However, it is in solitude where we can explore and define ourselves, which is necessary to be able to appreciate those surrounding us. If we are disconnected from our deeper selves, we turn to others to compensate the lack of self-assurance, therefore using them rather as “spare parts”, as Shelley put it, than companions. So as long as we keep running away from solitude into the depths of the Internet, we are actually falling deeper and deeper into isolation in reality. Therefore, it is of fundamental importance that we try to plug off once in a while to learn to deal with the company of our own selves.
However, Shelley finds it is not all that bad. She is strongly optimistic, that the onslaught of technology is simply a touchstone on our way to better, more true-hearted communication. It may actually be considered a tool to help us affirm our values and direction, to make us appreciate the company of one another over all else. Because, in the end, technology is just an emotionless bundle of codes and machinery which can offer us nothing more but what we know to ask for. We force it to work our way by programming them to act in a certain way under certain circumstances. Real human relationships, on the contrary, take unexpected turns and constantly surprise us since we can never know what the other person has in store for us. It is this same spontaneity we are so afraid of that actually emotionally attracts us to each other the way that computers will never be able to.
Technology is great. There is no denying that. But there is no such thing that is all-good, so we have to be on a constant lookout for its negative effects. As it endangers face-to-face human communication, it important to once again redefine the ways we see communication in order to ensure the sustainability of the social species that we as Homo sapiens sapiens are. 


HM

Thursday, 6 November 2014

Vocabulary Extention: Adjectives

Cunningham's chummy dropping of the ‘Mr’ from his name did not fool him for a moment: the withdrawn and irascible figure he had encountered in mid-afternoon was nearer the soul of this man than mine accommodating and smiling host of the Skein of Geese's oak-panelled restaurant. (Into the blue. Goddard, Robert. London: Transworld Publishers Ltd, 1990, pp. 119-225.)
Cunninghami semulik “härra”-tiitlist loobumine ei lollitanud teda hetkekski: see endassetõmbunud ja kergesti ärrituv tegelane, keda ta keskpärastlõunal kohanud oli, sarnanes veel vähem selle mehe hingega kui tammepaneelidega kaetud “Haneparve” restorani vastutulelik ja naeratav peremees minuga.

Belief in the devil persisted; for the dying and those ministering to them, Satan was no figment of a distraught imagination. (The masks of death. Cecil, Robert. Lewes, East Sussex: The Book Guild Ltd, 1991)
Usk kuradisse jäi püsima; surivoodil lebajate ja nende eest hooltitsejate jaoks ei olnud Saatan kõigest hullunud ettekujutluse vili.

It was evident from the young man's circumspect excitement that he thought he'd got his first genuine schizophrenic hypochondriac. (Cast in order of disappearance. Brett, Simon. London: Vicor Gollancz, 1975, pp. 31-192. )
Noormehe ettevaatlikust erutusest oli ilmne, et ta uskus end olevat just kogenud oma esimest ehtsat hullumeelset hüpohondriahoogu.

She felt herself to be still very slightly dazed, disorientated enough to give the impression that she was a disinterested observer of the scene and not quite able to realise that these things were in fact happening to her.(The truth of stone. Mackenzie, David S. Edinburgh: Mainstream Publishing Company Ltd, 1991, pp. 99-187)
Ta tundis end veel kergelt uimasena, piisavalt segaduses jätmaks muljet kui stseeni ükskõiksest pealtvaatajast, ning suutmata päriselt taibata, et need asjad olid juhtumas hoopis tema enesega. 

They were not overawed by the forbidding tors and jagged rocks, nor felt themselves threatened by the rolling acres of granite uplands. (Topaz. Bennetts, Pamela. UK: Magna Print Books, 1988, pp. 9-206.)
Nad ei heitunud ähvardavatest kaljutippudest ega sakilistestd kaljudest ega tundund end ohustatuna aakritepikkustest rulluvatest graniitkõrgustikest.

They were both busy people, preoccupied with their work — Robyn with her supervisions and the completion of her PhD, Charles with the demands of his new job — and the thought of having to adjust to another partner, to study their interests and minister to their needs, wearied them in anticipation.(Nice work. Lodge, David. London: Secker & Warburg, 1988, pp. 1-105)
Nad mõlemad olid hõivatud, tööga ülekoormatud inimesed - Robyn oma järelvalve ja doktorikraadi lõpetamisega, Charles uue töö nõudmistega - ja teise partneriga kohanemise, tema huvide tundma õppimise ning vastastikkuse abistamise mõte kurnas neid selle ootuses.

But he was equally unhappy with the typical alternative, with what he saw as the uneasy combination of materialism and immaterialism. (The empiricists. Woolhouse, R S. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988, )
Ent ta oli samavõrd õnnetu tüüpilise alternatiiviga, milles ta nägi vaid materialismi ja immaterialismi rahutut kombinatsiooni.

The cocoa-brown eyes were scanning her bewildered expression, and a glint of gentle amusement crept into the steady scrutiny. (Love by Design. Ryan, Kendall  )
Šokolaadipruunid silmad puurisid tema nõutut ilmet ja sellesse vankumatusse läbivaatlusse süvenenud näkku sugenes õrn lõbususenoot.

Already startled by the apparition, the crashing down of the big heavy door completely unnerved me.(Railway ghosts and phantoms. Herbert, W B. Newton Abbot, Devon: David & Charles Publishers plc, 1992, pp. 57-200.)
Ilmutusest niigi ehmunud, lõi suure raske ukse kokku varisemine mu täielikult verest välja.

And the sobbing began again, and to see her so defeated — remembering how gallant she had always been, even in the alley when she had attacked her assailant with her shoe — overwhelmed him. (An American princess. Marshall, Paula. Richmond, Surrey: Mills & Boon, 1993,)
Ja nuuksumine algas taas ning teda nii lööduna näha - mäletades kui vapper ta alati olnud oli, isegi ses kõrvaltänavas oma ründajale vaid kingaga kallale tormates - muserdas teda.


HM

Friday, 10 October 2014

There once lived a panda...

A lonely disoriented panda with an extremely poor sense of  the world around it walked into a high-security military camp carrying a menacing bamboo stick and unintentionally causing such havoc that the animal would end up in court testifying against an officer who dared to point a weapon at an individual of the species Ailuropoda melanoleuca, nearly reducing the population of the close-to-extinction animal species by yet another creature.


Wishing the best of luck to pandas
HM